Blog 10: EQ

1.   Review this.  Confirm by stating "I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ."
I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.

2.  

a.  What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?

I feel that this question does not meet the rule of three because it sounds very vague, almost general in such a way that inhibits depth.

 b.  What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?

This question does not meet the requirements of the rule of three because it's an incomplete sentence so the author's point isn't clear which then obscures the reader's understanding.

 c.  What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?

This question meets the rule of three, it is very clear and specific which allows for depth of research and allows the author room to argue a certain point.

 d.  How can an anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?

This question meets the rule of three because it is specific, has a sense of depth, is properly formatted, and allows the author to argue some point.

3.  Based on your review of the rule of 3 and your experience with assessing four EQs, please write another draft EQ for your senior project.  The senior team will be meeting with students shortly for EQ revision and approval; you are expected to bring your research notebook to that meeting with your EQ draft written inside in pencil.